I own a few properties in Jacksonville. If a tree or other object falls in my property, the law states that I am not responsible for anything, unless the tree hits a building, in which case I am responsible for repairing the other structure. But why do we need to wait for a tree to damage a primary house? What if the same tree takes out a shed or fence or other structure?
There has to be a cost associated with damage, albeit from God or some other being. We need to know that we can count on someone acting as insurance in the event of someone else's careless regard for their property, in leaving dead decaying trees on the property.
The law is flawed in my estimate, I want to have all of my property protected by the other person's neglect. Sadly I am a minority, or the politicians have some BS excuse for it, or some other reason to not do it. Maybe someone can enlighten me as to why insurance does not cover other's neglect in cases of damage to any part of the property.
Jack
No comments:
Post a Comment